Showing posts with label City Notes for Inspiring Books - 2017. Show all posts
Showing posts with label City Notes for Inspiring Books - 2017. Show all posts

Saturday, December 30, 2017

CN | Faith in Christ: Sacrificial Embrace Over Cynical Rejection



Faith Without Illusions | Biblical Alternatives to Cynicism


This final post to close 2017 is about a book that I continue to come back to as I continue to walk with Jesus and seek His Kingdom and His justice and righteousness among skeptics, seekers, and believers. 

Faith Without Illusions: Following Jesus as a Cynic-Saint is a thoughtful reflection on how disillusionment can help us understand what's really real and move us into hopeful realism. Author Andrew Byers shows that throughout the Scriptures, God has provided us with a way through critique and cynicism  of religion, the Church, and ourselves  and if we follow Jesus through it, we'll find His abundant life for us and others.

Below is the previous post:


Faith Without Illusions
 | The Righteous Lord Will Make All Things Right


Though the prophets, sages and poets of Israel exhibit much in common with the cynicism we see directed toward God and the church today, their indignation and misery were ultimately more constructive than destructive. The despair and fury are not to be blunted or dismissed, but it must be acknowledged that their ministries were ultimately grounded in the unfolding drama of God's redemption and restoration of all things. The ranting and raving of either Job or Jeremiah could give our fiercest contemporary cynics a run for their money. But the canonical witness of their stories within the wider story of the Bible nudges us toward a hopefulness premised on the belief, however faint it may be in dark times, that there is a righteous Lord who will make all things right – one day. + pgs. 119-120


For an unflawed role model for addressing God and his people in disappointment and dismay, we have only one we can turn to. ... Of all the leaders of both Israel and the church, no one has had more reason to cynically give up on the people of God than the Messiah, and yet no one gave so much. Of all the leaders who found themselves seemingly rejected by God after embracing a divine summons to service, no one had more reason to shake a cynical fist heavenward, yet no one obeyed so fully. + pg. 121

The Way of the Prophet | Prophetic Anguish Instead of Cynical Anger

If we are to understand prophetic criticism, we must see that its characteristic idiom is anguish, not anger. – Walter Brueggemann, The Prophetic Imagination, pg. 123


This is the burden of a prophet: compassion for man and sympathy for God. + Abraham Heschel, The Prophets, pg. 123

 As an example of suffering and patience, brothers, take the prophets who spoke in the name of the Lord. + James 5:10

Prophetic ministry is the outcry of God through his servants in specific situations in life. When Amos writes that God 'does nothing / without revealing his secret / to his servants the prophets' (Amos 3:7), he is affirming that our God is a God of means. God conducts much of his work in this world via human agency, vocalizing his protest against injustice and error through faithful servants. ... the church's need for prophetic ministry is just as dire today as it was during the days of Isaiah or Zephaniah. + pg. 128

During the days of Elijah and Elisha there was a school of prophets dwelling in remote areas due to political persecution. Certain groups of false prophets happily delivered oracles that tickled the royal ear of the king, but those whose voices were faithfully fractious were unwelcome in the public square and relegated to the fringes. Elijah's vocational hazards repeatedly compelled him to seek refuge in wilderness regions or in Gentile territory. When Jezebel began programmatically destroying Yahweh worship, prophets became an endangered species. A fellow named Obadiah found one hundred of them for whom he provided the safe haven of a cave. Years later the priest at Bethel during the reign of King Jeroboam II (with whom Jonah may be associated, at least in a literary sense if not in a historical sense) told Amos to leave town and take his inconvenient oracles elsewhere. A century later we encounter Jeremiah, perhaps the most unwanted prophet to walk the streets of Jerusalem (until Jesus, at least). The false prophets happily declared 'peace, peace' (Jeremiah 6:14; 8:11; cf. Ezekiel 13:10, 16) where there was no peace were heartily received in the royal court and on the temple steps. The prophets true to God were such nuisances that they were tossed to the fringes. + pgs. 129-130

Even so, disgust and frustration were not accepted as excuses for prophets disengaging themselves from God or his people. It was certainly a temptation. Elijah seemed ready to turn in his prophetic mantle and die under that broom tree (1 Kings 19). Isaiah was instructed to proclaim truth to those who would never embrace his message (Isaiah 6). Jeremiah may have wanted to run, but he found himself unable to abandon his sorrowful mission of preaching God's word – 'I am weary with holding it in, / and I cannot' (Jeremiah 20:9). They did not take jibes and critical shots at Judah or Israel while seated comfortably on the fringes with their prophet cronies. Instead, they were nudged by God to keep plodding from the fringes to engage those to whom they were sent. ... It does not appear as though the prophets cracked derisive smiles when they vocalized God's disappointment. They often exhibited sympathy and were at times personally grieved over the pain and turmoil of their tough messages. Though shoved to the fringes, they were called to embrace and even embody the plights of the people they served, occasionally identifying with forthcoming national sufferings by way of symbolic actions: Jeremiah strapped a yoke to his back to symbolize the coming lordship of the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar (Jeremiah 27); Ezekiel laid on his side eating food baked over dung to personally represent the siege of Jerusalem (Ezekiel 4); the New Testament prophet Agabus bound his hands and feet with a belt to show Paul the fate awaiting him (Acts 21). These dramatic actions served as visible means of instruction and required the prophet to physically identify with the impending misery of God's people. Even when the prophets did not overtly sympathize with the misery of their hearers (Jeremiah was told at certain moments not even to intercede for them! (Jeremiah 7:16; 11:14; 14:11-12)), they were nonetheless called to sympathize with the misery of God himself. + pgs. 132-133

It is difficult to care for those who frustrate us. It is difficult to care about a belief system that seems to have left us empty. Without a vested interest in the health of the church, cynics sneer at the shortcomings and tragedies in organized Christianity rather than plodding from the fringes into the fray to somehow bring salutary correction. There is an absence of pathos (apathy) rather than a participation in the pathos (sympathy). And sometimes apathy is simply the prelude to a cruel antipathy that delights in seeing the bubbles burst (or the city consumed with fire from the sky). ... When God is angry with his children, it is not divorced from compassionate grief. Reading Hosea is a bumpy journey through the conflicting emotions of One who is not only full of wrath but also full of longing for his wayward people ... Only if our anger is sourced in the slow and conflicted anger of God is it justified. ... 'The cross is the assurance that effective prophetic criticism is done not by an outsider but always by one who must embrace the grief, enter into the death, and know the pain of the criticized one.' ... The hope offered through the prophets was the hope that God himself would make all things right, that God would be the shepherd Israel's leaders failed to be (Ezekiel 34), that God would be the King no mortal son of David could be (Zechariah 14). And this hope is conjoined with a passionate love not only for God but also for the troubled people whom he intends to redeem. + pgs. 133-137  

The Way of the Sage | Biblical Wisdom Instead of Cynical Intellectualism


This phrase 'the fear of the LORD' opens and closes the first major section of Proverbs (see Proverbs 1:7; 9:10), and it is found at the book's closing (Proverbs 31:30), forming in both cases what in literary terms is called an inclusio. This worshipful reverence cannot be underestimated; without it, the cynic's pursuit of insight will be doomed to failure from the start. Biblical wisdom is never divorced from a human and godly disposition – 'He stores up sound wisdom for the upright' (Proverbs 2:7, emphasis added). If we want to be numbered among the wise, then we must subordinate our academic careers, our late-night readings, our early morning studies and our sparring dialogues beneath the ultimate objective of fearfully honoring the One who has no need for anyone's instructions. + pg. 142


(Job's friends') theology is tidy, respectable, clear. But when we get to the end of the book, God rebukes them, because they 'have not spoken of me what is right' (Job 42:7). In his moment of greatest need Job is barraged with an idealizing misuse of wisdom that was as unsustainable in Uz as it is today. Good things happen to good people, Job. God helps those who help themselves. God will never give you more than you can handle. The popular wisdom that Job's story is written to silence is centered on ancient ideas regarding 'retribution' the righteous will experience blessing and the unrighteous misfortune. If we live a clean life, then we won't get cancer and our business will thrive. If we do get cancer, if our business falters or if our marriage or ministry crumbles, then there must be unrighteousness somewhere in our lives. Each of Job's friends express this oversimplified, popular wisdom that bad things do not happen to good people who faithfully follow God. ... the kind of God Job worships and refuses to curse threatens all mortal aspirations to be in control. The uncomplicated god of Job's friends plays by the rules, blessing those who do good and afflicting only those who do wrong. ... Contrary to the aphoristic and vapid theology of Job's idealistic friends, God presents himself as one who defies all attempts at domestication, as one who knows no limits as defined by human convenience. The God of the book of Job is free, that is, free to act as he deems appropriate on the basis of a wisdom too profound for mortal minds. And this divine freedom can sometimes seem to impinge on human existence. What does it do to our theology to know that Job's suffering can be traced back to a little wager God made with Satan in the opening chapters of Job? What does it do to our theology to know that God keeps a great, fire-breathing dragon as a pet? This God we serve and worship keeps monsters as 'plaything.' + pgs. 144, 146-147

If anyone has the right to remain a lifelong, card-carrying cynic in the story, it is Job every character seems to let him down. But he does not eye his friends in contemptuous annoyance for long. Though God would not hear the idealists' prayers, we find in the final chapter that Job is instructed to intercede on their behalf. After all that pop theology, after all those rosy comments, Job prays for them. Would a cynic have prayed for mercy to be shown to his idealist friends? + pg. 148   

'Guard your steps when you go to the house of God. To draw near to listen is better than to offer the sacrifice of fools, for they do not know that they are doing evil. Be not rash with your mouth, nor let your heart be hasty to utter a word before God, for God is in heaven and you are on earth. Therefore let your words be few' (Ecclesiastes 5:1-2). ... In a brilliant work interfacing Ecclesiastes' wisdom with the claims of postmodernism, theologian Peter Leithart argues that Qoholeth (here 'Solomon') teaches an eschatological perspective that embraces hopefulness. 'Solomon's unblinking examination of power and oppression is pervaded by an eschatological faith that this world of tears under the sun is not the only world, a confidence that there is a time after the time under the sun.' Leithart points out that Ecclesiastes ends with the expectation of divine judgment: 'For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil' (Ecclesiastes 12:14). This is not a pessimistic statement but an expression of trust in the character of the mysterious God who will one day set straight the human frailty and the cosmic chaos that makes everything under the sun appear vain and senseless. + pgs. 152-153

The epistle of James is a New Testament example of Jewish wisdom literature, and early in the first pages we are taught that true wisdom is granted from God in response to childlike trust: 'If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. But let him ask in faith, with no doubting, for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind' (James 1:5-6). Later, James offers an important description of this biblical wisdom: 'But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peacable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere. And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace (James 3:17-18). + pg. 155

The Way of the Tragic Poet | Worshipful Lament Instead of Cynical Complaint

The psalms of negativity, the complaints of various kinds, the cries for vengeance and profound penitence are foundational to a life of faith in this particular God. Much Christian piety is romantic and unreal in its positiveness. As children of the Englightenment, we have censored and selected around the voice of darkness and disorientation, seeking to go from strength to strength, from victory to victory. But such a way not only ignores the Psalms; it is a lie in terms of our experience. ... The Jewish reality of exile, the Christian confession of crucifixion and cross, the honest recognition that there is an untamed darkness in our life that must be embraced – all of this is fundamental to the gift of new life+ Walter Brueggemann, Spirituality of the Psalms, pg.157


At times it will appear as though God has failed us. Where will we go when we've turned to him who is the first and the last, the beginning and the end, and he is either nowhere to be found or, even worse, the one who seems to be the source of our affliction? ... For vocabulary and grammar suitable to such dark and bitter pain, we turn to the despondent laments of tragic poets who, before us, suffered from disillusionment with God. Though most of those haunting cries are found in the Psalms, we have already encountered some cries of the poets – the prophet Jeremiah and the sage behind the book of Job were certainly familiar with the Hebrew language of lament. When we find ourselves in spiritual shambles, quaking in our disappointment with God, these tragic poets and their tumultuous words help us navigate our way through the murky waters. ... Scholars have identified various categories of our 150 psalms, and the largest of these categories is the lament, representing roughly a third of the entire Psalter. So within the worship book of Israel, within the pages of that collection designated as 'Praises,' there is mourning. There is pain. There is groping in the dark. + pgs. 158-159

Claus Westermann, one of the most influential scholars on the psalms in the twentieth century, writes that 'it is an illusion to suppose or to postulate that there could be a relationship with God in which there was only praise and never lamentation. ... (S)omething must be amiss if praise of God has a place in Christian worship but lamentation does not. The cries and blunt questions directed to God in the Psalms, however, are only appropriate within the context of worship. The voluminous presence of laments in the Psalter show us that just as our responses to victory and divine deliverance must be acts of faithful devotion, so also our expressions of pain and misery before God must be acts of faithful devotion, however discordant the tone. At some point along the way the Western church stopped associating weeping with worship. ... Because of this, we have become less hospitable to the dispirited and injured individuals for whom the church should serve as a haven for healing. When the depressed and the disconsolate are in our midst, do they feel free not to answer 'fine, just fine' to our greetings? Are they silently shunned when they talk of God as though he is their oppressor rather than their Deliverer? Does the worship service provide them with a context in which they are encouraged to express their pain (and not just their joy) as an act of worshiping God? ... When the church fails to provide some outlet for crying to God from 'out of the depths' (Psalm 130:1), then broken souls will turn elsewhere. ... (Again) By minimizing – or worse, eliminating – the biblical role of lament in the life of the church, we are communicating to the world, as well as to members of our own congregations, that they must take their struggles with God elsewhere+ pgs. 160-161


Biblical laments exhibit a couple of literary features that bear tremendous theological importance for how we address God out of darkness and despair:

(1) The first is that most lament psalms begin with an immediate address to God, usually employing the covenant name Yahweh (denoted in our English translations in small caps as 'LORD' or 'GOD'). This is no minor detail in the structure of laments – such an initial invocation demonstrates that God is ultimately the one to whom we turn, even when he seems to be the reason behind our pain. This God-ward orientation places the complaint within the context of worship: 'The lament is not a mere venting of emotion intended primarily to provide emotional relief to the psalmist; rather it is a supplication of divine assistance, and in this it is an implicit statement of faith.' The fact that laments regularly open with 'O Yahweh/LORD' confirms that our suffering is to be incorporated into our worship. If pain and disillusionment are removed from the realm of personal communication with God, then further bitterness is inevitable. In exposing their wounds to Yahweh, the stricken poets were presenting themselves before a person God who had entered into a sacred covenant with his people. The direct divine address of the lament psalms encourages us to approach God in our own anguish, though we must do so as worshipers who have such a personal relationship with him that we can call him by his revealed covenant name. Eugene Peterson observes of the psalms: 'Every skeptical thought, every disappointing venture, every pain, every despair that we can face is lived through and integrated into a personal, saving relationship with God.' ... The opening address of God in the psalms of lament demonstrates that, in spite of the emotional turmoil of their tortured speeches, these tragic poets were vigorously God-centered. We must therefore bring our disillusionment with God to God, and this address is worshipful in that it acknowledges God as the one audience who matters most: 'O Lord, all my longing is before you; my sighing is not hidden from you' (Psalm 38:9). 'But as for me, my prayer is to you, O LORD' (Psalm 69:13).
(2) A second literary feature of the lament psalms instructive for how we deal with our disillusionment with God is the sudden insertion of praise or expressions of hope in the midst of the despairing please. Almost every lament psalm has at least some inkling of hopefulness. In many cases, the shift from complaint to praise is found at the end of the psalm. This 'internal transition' is so common that Westermann is convinced that 'there is not a single Psalm of lament that stops with lamentation. Lamentation has no meaning in and of itself.' 

... With these two literary features – the immediate address of God and the transition from sorrow to hope  the tragic poets of Israel encourage us to bring our pain and grief before the God who will one day set us free. Disillusionment with God does not license us to cease worshiping him. + pgs. 162-165


No matter how fierce the trial, no matter how severe the torment, we are always the supplicant. We are never in the position to demand mastery over our fate. We are always clay in the hand of the Potter. But we can ask questions of God, even pointed, impassioned, tear-choked and agonizing questions. In each of the psalms cited (Psalm 22:1; 42:9; 74:1; 79:10; 115:2; 85:5-6; 94:3), the questions are eventually followed by the characteristic transition from despair to hope or praise. The tragic poet of Lamentations even manages to break out into energetic praise in the middle of chapter 3. So though we may bring our aching, yearning questions before God, we do so as worshipers who are ever pressing toward praise, rejoicing that 'the reason the darkness can be faced and lived in is that even in the darkness, there is One to address. + pg. 166


Thomas Merton wrote that 'there is no night of the soul that has not been experienced before us by the psalmists.' + pg. 168 

Whether it is right or not to angrily question God, the reality impressed on us as we read the biblical laments is that at times we will angrily question God. Somewhere in the tension between 'woe to him who quarrels with his Maker' and 'Awake! Why are you sleeping, O Lord?' we must acknowledge that God graciously permits limited space for us to vent our languishing, bitter pain in anger. I don't think God welcomes or encourages our indignant interrogations – I'm just saying he seems to graciously provide a bit of room for them, and he is big enough to handle the fuss. Though Job's questions were ultimately drowned out by God's own questions back to him, it was Job's friends – the ones who tried to shut him up – who God reprimanded for speaking about him wrongly. + pg. 170

I would never want to deny or ignore the gnawing darkness of Psalm 88, one of the rare lament psalms in which there is no discernible transition out of despair. Those terrible, weary words, so pregnant with aching, groaning misery, are ever-screeching and shouting out from the dead center of our Bibles. So there may indeed be some mysterious place between blasphemy and reverence from which we may cry out to God in utter horror and in bitter anger. Should we ever find ourselves in such a precarious, risky place, however, we must remember in our importunate banging on heaven's door that 'all who have raged against him / will come to him and be put to shame' (Isaiah 45:24 NIV; cf. 2 Kings 19:28; Isaiah 37:29). We will likely find ourselves humbled and silenced like Job, but perhaps in such catastrophic pain it is possible that no other path is available. May God help us – and forgive us. + pg. 170


Imprecatory laments must not be employed for self-centered means. The prayers for vindication are overwhelmingly God-centered, just as we have seen that the complaints of the Psalter are ultimately God-centered. We must remember that these furious cries for justice in the lament psalms are still a part of Israel's hymn book – the ultimate purpose of the prayers for judgment is the worship of the Judge. It would be all too easy for jaded Christians to wrongly appeal to the tragic poets' demands for vengeance to justify personal vendettas with others or grudges toward the church. The imprecations of the psalms and lament, however, are the indignant protests of those who have been trained in the righteousness of Yahweh and refuse to tolerate injustice. Though the experience of their enemies' assaults is acutely personal, their desire for personal vindication is ultimately rooted in their desire for divine vindication. It is God's honor that is most at stake when the wicked prosper and cruel assailants take what they want. + pgs. 173-174


Though the New Testament recasts how we treat our enemies as we await this new situation, we may still pray passionately for immediate justice as we anticipate the eventual day of judgment. The imprecatory section of Psalm 69 is cited by both Paul and Luke in the New Testament (Romans 11:9-10; Acts 1:20) and the martyrs in John's apocalyptic vision cry out 'in a loud voice' words that seem more fitting in an Old Testament lamentation: 'O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before you will judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth"' (Revelation 6:10). These holistic prayers of the tragic poets will disturb the comfortable. For those who are disillusioned with God because they have suffered violently at the hands of others, they may provide comfort; though their presence in Scripture must not be used as excuses for nurturing a begrudging, self-centered bitterness. They instead challenge injured cynics to ground their hope for justice in the righteousness of God and not in their own sense of self-dignity. + pgs. 174-175

For complaints to be truly biblical, however, they must ultimately be characterized by worship. Now, as discussed earlier, worship can be in the form of weeping – it does not have to appear tidy and nice. Worship can even be in the form of posing questions to God since, in the questioning, there is the implicit acknowledgement that God is the one with the final say. ... But any attempt to approach God outside of worship is not only wrong, but dangerous (and in the end, impossible, actually). Even dreary Psalm 88 begins with the characteristic address of God by his covenant name Yahweh, indicating a God-ward orientation on behalf of the beleaguered poet. So the ultimate distinction between worshipful lament and cynical complaint is the orientation of worship. ... The brokenness of human misery before God may recede into bitterness, but healing comes when we bring our maladies to him and check into his healing ward. We do this not by avoiding him in disillusionment but by crying out to him from the depths and striving with all our might to grasp onto something hopeful from his hand. There may be no greater act of worship than an embittered cynic daring to bring his injured, angry soul before the presence of the One who seems to have caused injuries. 'Let the bones that you have broken rejoice' (Psalm 51:8). 'Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God; for I shall again praise him, my salvation and my God' (Psalm 42:11). ... The tragic poets' prayers arise from trials that lie at the limits (and at times beyond the limits) of the bearable. Since these laments are canonized as Scripture, we can utilize them to give voice to our own sufferings; yet we do so only with great care and respect. The sacred language of biblical laments that have emerged from pestilence, from severe illness and from heart-stopping regret are not available for cynics who are just looking for any old ax to grind with God. + pgs. 175-177 

The Way of the Christ | Sacrificial Embrace Instead of Cynical Rejection

What does it mean to recall the God who was crucified in a society whose official creed is optimism, and which is knee-deep in blood. ... Jesus Christ died crying out 'My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?' All Christian theology and all Christian life is basically an answer to the question which Jesus asked as he died. + Jurgen Moltmann, The Crucified God, pg. 179


Consider him who endured from sinners such hostility against himself, so that you may not grow weary or fainthearted. + Hebrews 12:3pg. 179

We are faced with this wonderful, or not-so-wonderful irony: Jesus – most admired, most worshiped (kind of), most written about. And least followed. + Eugene Peterson, The Jesus Way, pg. 179


If anyone in our Scriptures had a right to be cynical towards God's people, it is the One who suffered most unjustly at their hands and yet gave more than anyone else on their behalf. If anyone had a right to be cynical with God, it is the One who suffered the most excruciating divine abandonment ever and yet deserved it the least. Can anyone justify being a cynic if Jesus was not a cynic? + pg. 185

The confrontational nature of his teaching is best seen in his interrogatory response to the religious leaders during the last week of his life. Just as God silenced Job's questions with questions of his own, Jesus silenced the scribes, priests and lawyers by responding to their questions with even better questions. This continued until finally 'no one was able to answer him a word, nor from that day did anyone dare to ask him any more questions' (Matthew 22:46). His brilliant didactics clearly placed Jesus among the celebrated sages of Israel's past. But Jesus was much more than just a sage: 'The queen of the South will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and behold, something greater than Solomon is here' (Matthew 12:42). John tells us that Jesus was the 'Word' and that the 'Word became flesh' (John 1:1-14). Wisdom could be personified in ancient writings and associated with the concept of 'Word' (logos in the Greek). Jesus was not only a sage, but One 'greater than Solomon,' who came as the very embodiment of divine Wisdom. ... Jesus was unafraid to challenge his hearers with his knowledge, but he also knew when to hold back – 'I have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now' (John 16:12). He did not exploit the masses with his superior intelligence. + pg. 188


The scene from Jesus' boyhood (see Luke 2:41-52) encourages us to be exceptional students of wisdom and intimately conversant with the Scriptures. Mary and Joseph saw that Jesus yearned to remain 'in my Father's house' (Luke 2:49), surrounded by all that exhilarating teaching, but he did not embrace a pedantic life confined to ivory towers. He took his wisdom to fishing shores and dusty streets. As the preeminent Sage, his example challenges us to avoid intellectual banter behind closed doors (or behind the backs of the untrained) and to actively engage the people of God with strong, focused teaching that undermines falsehood and promotes truth. + pg. 188

The seven judgments of Matthew 23 are followed by a prophetic lament so poignant with grief that we must read the woe pronouncements as coming from the lips of a broken, mourning shepherd: 'O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing' (Matthew 23:27 NIV; cf. Luke 13:34-35). By ending the woes with imagery of maternal longing, it is clear that 'the woes were uttered in regret, that the indignation was righteous.' The picture of a mother hen stretching out her wings to draw her helpless little ones into the safety of her breast betokens a Savior whose arms are aching form being outstretched for so long. His disappointment in his people is only as acute as his love for his people. + pg. 191


Jesus' compassionate response to those who cried out in distress is consistent with the openness of Yahweh to receive the cries of Israel in the Old Testament laments. ... when we have no words yet must somehow say something in darkness, we may turn to the laments just as Jesus did, when in his first awful shout he 'cried with a loud voice, ... 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'' (Mark 15:34; cf. Psalm 22:1). To give voice to the horror of the moment, Jesus embraced the tragic poetry of Israel's hymn book. + pgs. 193-194

The most compelling action from the life of Jesus for cynics to ponder is not his cleansing of the temple or his cursing of the fruitless fig tree – it is his inaction on the cross. Behold the restraint of Jesus when they mocked his captivity to a cross he could have splintered and consumed in heavenly fire, yet he did not. He could have prayed for legions of angels to appear with flaming swords (Matthew 26:53), yet he did not. And instead of praying an imprecatory prayer, Luke writes that he prayed, 'Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do' (Luke 23:34). If there is anyone who deserved to be cynical, it was the guy with Gentile spittle running down his beard and his nation's demands for his death ringing in his ears. But Jesus was not a cynic. If he had been a cynic, Jesus would not have given his life for crowds that said things like 'We have no king but Caesar.' If he had been a cynic, Jesus would not have given his life for friends he saw scatter in disloyal cowardice the night before. A cynic would not die for misguided masses gorging themselves with pop theology. A cynic would not die for pompous religious leaders drunk with power and blinded to their religiosity. A cynic would have crossed his arms and turned away in hurtful anger. But Jesus arms were fixed to a cross and splayed wide open. + pgs. 196-197 

On the Roads to Emmaus and Damascus | Resurrection, Paul and Hopeful Realism 

"Resurrection announces the end of cynicism. And the end of cynicism will sound like this: 'O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting? (1 Corinthians; cf. Isaiah 25:8; Hosea 13:14). Resurrection announces the end of cynicism because it heralds the end of all that makes us cynical. The old age of sin and death, thorns and thistles, disorder and disillusionment – it entered its dusk on the dawn of the third day. Satan is weeping and gnashing his teeth. Death is choking on its own death rattle. And the sweet fragrance of new creation is rising from the blank emptiness of Jesus' grave. Resurrection renders cynicism obsolete. Cynicism is no longer necessary in the face of death's impending death and with the light of new creation shining out in the distance and in our midst. + pgs. 201-202

Christ's resurrection is the signature of new creation. It claims that nothing is irredeemable. Nothing. Cynics may protest that a perspective of already but not yet is simply not good enough for life lived in the present. But the drama narrated throughout Scripture pressures us to live in the present in light of the future. To make matters even better, the New Testament clarifies that tomorrow is ever encroaching backward into today. When we believe that new creation is in the works and on the way, then a daring hopefulness infuses our experience of daily reality, even when that reality is steeped in the brokenness of the old age, kicking and screaming in its waning hour. ... To our great relief Scripture's overarching story gradually reveals the shockingly good news that God is not only Creator but also the Re-creator. The One who made all things 'good' will one day make all things 'new.' ... Remember that odd scene in Joh's Gospel when the resurrected Christ breathes on his disciples and tells them to receive the Holy Spirit (John 20:22)? This is the reenactment of Genesis 2:7 when God breathed his 'breath of life' (the word for 'breath' here in the Hebrew can also mean 'Spirit') into dust and created Adam. Jesus is God's agent of new creation. The consummation awaits his return (the parousia), so for the time being we live in this awkward overlap of the ages. Chaos and Satan still screech and howl, but amid the din of death there is a new sound, the new age's sweet melody, the faint but lovely tune that preludes joyful trumpet blasts. Those who lack ears to hear this melody will by cynics. Those who hum along while groaning with creation are hopeful realists. + pgs. 202-203, 205


'I wrote to you out of much affliction and anguish of heart and with many tears, not to cause you pain but to let you know the abundant love that I have for you' (2 Corinthians 2:4). Is this normal attitude we take when confronting churches today? Do we admonish more out of disgust or out of a love so strong that we can say with Paul, 'I will most gladly spend and be spent for your souls'? (2 Corinthians 12:15). Even among the dysfunctional Corinthians, Paul exemplifies a ministry that is constructive and not destructive, one that is 'for building up and not for tearing down' (2 Corinthians 13:10). ... This is who you are in Christ (indicative), now act like it (imperative). Paul was as pastorally engaged with the filth and the funk of sinful Christians as any minister who has ever served a church. But his insistence that new creation is on the way and breaking into the present prevented him from becoming a cynic. + pgs. 207-208

I think Paul would balk at the disillusionment of most Christian cynics today. He would wonder if we had ever read a page out of our New Testaments. Jesus promised his followers a life of adversity, a life Paul knew intimately. There is no way around it – to follow the way of the Christ is to end up on a cross. But to follow the way of the Christ is also to rise from out of a tomb: 'If we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his' (Romans 6:5; cf. Philippians 3:10-11). In maintaining the dual realities of creation's groaning and eventual renewal, hopeful realism must embrace a life shaped both by the cross (cruciformity, Michael Gorman's helpful term for describing the shape of a cross) and by the empty tomb (anastasisity, Michael Bird's creative term from the Greek word for 'resurrection'). Paul had to become content with distress, pain, frustration and suffering because they characterize the mode of life necessary for following the way of the Christ. There is no true Christian ministry apart from the potentially disillusioning experiences of suffering, betrayal and imminent death. These experiences did not lead to cynicism, because Paul knew that the cross is not the terminal stop in following the way of the Christ. Entering Christ's death and agony will result in exiting out of his grave – and one day our own. + pg. 209


When we realize that embracing cross pain and resurrection joy are the biblical standards of discipleship, then our wounds can lead to 'newness of life' (Romans 6:4) instead of bitterness of soul. When we realize that 'the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed to us' (Romans 8:18), then our trials will become less disillusioning. ... Resurrection is God whispering death threats in death's ears. The open tomb of Jesus is a hole in the system that cannot be patched. The re-creating King has climbed up out of his grave. He is out there, loose, at large, roaming free – and returning at dawn. + pg. 209, 211 

City Notes are meant to provide you with direct quotes from some books I've read this year, so you can get a taste of the overall theme of the book and then begin to chew on what your life might look like if you applied what you read.

Here are links to previous City Notes books: A Meal with Jesus; The Art of NeighboringA Praying Life Encounters with JesusThe Rest of God; Everyday ChurchNotes from a Failed Missionary on Rediscovering FaithThe Pursuing GodYawning at Tigers; Gospel Fluency; Evangelical, Sacramental, and Pentecostal

+ Rev. Mike "Sully" Sullivan

Friday, December 29, 2017

CN | Faith Without Illusions: What Makes Us Cynical




Faith Without Illusions Part 1 of 2 What Makes Us Cynical


This first post of two to close 2017 is about a book that I continue to come back to as I continue to walk with Jesus and seek His Kingdom and His justice and righteousness among skeptics, seekers, and believers. 

Faith Without Illusions: Following Jesus as a Cynic-Saint is a thoughtful reflection on how disillusionment can help us understand what's not real and then move us into hopeful realism. Author Andrew Byers shows that throughout the Scriptures, God has provided us with a way through critique and cynicism  of religion, the Church, and ourselves  and if we follow Jesus through it, we'll find His abundant life for us and others.


 



What Makes Us Cynical | Cynical Between the Edens Quotes

Dietrich Bonhoeffer actually hailed disillusionment with the church as a divine gift. The crushing of unrealistic dreams about God's people (as well as ourselves) is an act of God's grace: 'Just as surely as God desires to lead us to a knowledge of genuine Christian fellowship, so surely must we be overwhelmed by a great disillusionment with others, with Christians in general, and with ourselves ... Only that fellowship which faces such disillusionment, with all its unhappy and ugly aspects, begins to be what it should be in God's sight, begins to grasp in faith the promise that is given to it. The sooner this shock of disillusionment comes to an individual and to a community the better for both.' This great theologian passionately calls us to disillusionment. But for the disillusionment to bear its fruit, we have to embrace it without collapsing into cynicism. When we experience hurtful illumination and resist turning cynical, we may realize that we have been entrusted with a tremendous gift that can be used for the edification of the church. If we can manage to find healing and regain our footing a bit after the rug has been ripped out from beneath us, then we may be used by God to free others from faulty ideas about our faith. Redeemed cynics have much to offer. ... Those prone to cynicism possess insights that the church, sick with populist misconceptions and ridiculous practices, desperately needs. Their voices will only be helpful, though, if, like Paul after his epiphany on the Damascus Road, their wounds can be restored to health. We are in dire need for redeemed cynics to dress their wounds that they may rise up and flourish in the truths revealed to them for the health of the church and for the glory of God. + pgs. 11-12

The attitude of cynicism ... denies the reality that God has promised new creation, that it is just around the corner and that it is making appearances in the here and now through the work of Christ and his Spirit. We need to foster a biblical spirituality that embraces the grim reality of our ex-Eden life along with the joyful reality that God is making all things news. ... Scripture vividly portrays the people of God as a community prone to wander and ever in need of renewal and reform. Scripture also offers guidance on the proper means of promoting that renewal and reform. ... resurrection changes everything. We may live on the dark, eastern edge of Eden, but new creation awaits, and for the hopeful realists who have eyes to see and ears to hear, it keeps bursting into the present. ... Nothing heals like the awareness that God's love is large enough to embrace a church full of misguided failures, among whom I will ever be numbered. + pgs. 12-13, 23

What Makes Us Cynical | Idealism

Due to a variety of cultural socioeconomic factors, many Christians have their hopes anchored in optimistic ideals that could only come from a God who wields a magic wand and brings a kingdom that strangely resembles the Magic Kingdom! This idealistic spirituality embraces the legitimate Christian realities of triumph, strength, deliverance, joy and happiness without also embracing the equally (and often more immediate) Christian realities of suffering, pain, struggle and weakness. By embracing this triumphalistic understanding of Christianity, we are unwittingly populating our pews and our world with jaded cynics, because idealism is not tenable. Our unrealistic expectations of what it means to live as people of faith in a fractured, dystopian, ex-Eden world is providing wind for the sails of many whose faith is on the edge of being shipwrecked. ... We tend to idealize humanity and the world we live in, which creates twisted expectations that our view of God must conform to. These unrealistic ideas show up in our feel-good sermons, our trivializations of suffering and in the constant flow of our peppy, motivational lingo. So, disassembly is required in our view of humanity (anthropology), in our view of the world (cosmology) and in our view of God (theology). + pgs. 30, 33


The positive anthropology that we are made in the imago Dei (Latin for 'image of God') does not license us to be too impressed with ourselves. Celebrating the God-given beauty of humankind is always just a spit away from distorting into the humanistic teaching of modernity that we are God-independent and sufficient in and of ourselves to achieve and succeed. ... This idealizing of ourselves tends to deny not only our natural limitations but our moral sinfulness. Though we are made in God's image, that image has been marred and damaged by sin. Ignoring the nightmarish reality of original sin sets us up for grave disappointment in ourselves and in others. ... Just as there is tension in biblical anthropology (we are made in God's image, yet that image is marred by sin), there is also tension in biblical cosmology – God created the world good, but it, too, is marred by sin. While hiking on a mountain with a friend, I told him how I always strive to hear the sound of creation declaring God's praise when I am outdoors. 'I do the same,' he said, 'but I also strive to hear the sound of creation groaning.' It was a good reminder of the cosmological teaching we find from Paul that all creation is 'subjected to futility,' in 'bondage to decay' and 'groaning' with anticipation for the completion of God's redeeming work (see Romans 8:20-22)." + pgs. 34-35, 37 

The victory granted us in the world is not escape from pain and suffering, but strength to endure pain and suffering. The victorious Christian is not someone who has made a lot of money, found a 'hot' spouse, and evaded disease and injury. The victorious Christian is one who is clinging so tightly to Christ as the highest treasure that he or she can be 'content' in 'whatever situation' (Philippians 4:11). We love to quote 'I can do all things through him who strengthens me' (Philippians 4:13), but we easily forget that those words came from someone in a prison cell, and God had strengthened him to learn 'the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need' (Philippians 4:12, emphasis added). ... if our gospel cannot speak to Auschwitz, if it cannot speak to marauded villages in the eastern Congo, if it cannot speak in the ears of abducted children, if it cannot make sense to mothers digging for children in earthquake rubble, then it ought not sound forth from polished pulpits in carpeted suburban sanctuaries. ... Our theology must be capacious enough for a God who is sovereign over episodes of both rescue and defeat. 'The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD' (Job 1:21). God himself makes this striking declaration in Isaiah 45:7: 'I form light and create darkness, I make well-being and create calamity, I am the LORD, who does all these things (see Deuteronomy 32:39). Hannah acknowledged in her prayer, 'The LORD kills and bring to life; / he brings down to Sheol and raises up' (1 Samuel 2:6). Are we willing to worship a God who refuses conformity to our idealism? + pgs. 39-40


Is Jesus real? The answer is no if we are talking about a Christ who 'will never give us more than we can handle.' This phrase is offered as consolation with the regularity of a favored Bible verse. Though the intentions are commendable, the theology is a bit off. I think the idea comes from 1 Corinthians 10:13 – 'No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.' Behind the English temptation and be tempted in this verse are the Greek words peirasmos and peirazo. A peirasmos can refer to a trial. If this were the case in 1 Corinthians 10:13, then 'God will never give you more than you can handle' would be an appropriate paraphrase. It is clear from the context, however, that the noun and verbal form of the word refers to 'temptation' and 'being tempted' – the following verse 14 reads, 'Therefore, ...  flee from idolatry.' Paul is urging the Corinthian believers to resist the temptation to participate in the idolatrous practices of their surrounding culture, drawing from Israel's exodus wanderings as examples. So what God will never give us more than we can handle is the temptation to sin, specifically, in 1 Corinthians 10:13, the temptation to commit idolatry. The text is about escaping sin's difficult temptations, not about escaping the world's difficult circumstances. Paul actually found that God will sometimes give us way more than we can handle for the purpose of disassembling our self-reliance and establishing reliance on God alone: 'For we were so utterly burdened beyond our strength that we despaired of life itself ...  But that was to make us rely not on ourselves but on God who raises the dead' (2 Corinthians 1:8-9, emphasis added). ... Yes, Jesus is real, and sometimes he cures people. But sometimes he doesn't. He grants many of our requests in prayer. But not all of them. The most heartfelt prayer ever lifted in history was his own, and it was unanswered – 'Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from Me' (Luke 22:42). And the next day he became 'Christ crucified' (1 Corinthians 1:23), not Christ idealized. Can we worship this Lord who gives and takes away, who was himself taken in the night and then given no aid on Golgotha? Blessed be this name of this Lord?" + pgs. 42-44

The 'impenetrable mystery' of our faith is that Christ has 'conquered the world' through a cross. The victory of the 'victorious Christian life' has been secured not by escaping pain but by embracing pain's deepest depths. ... Modernity has preached a message of hope and gradual improvement, but that hope has been lodged in human ingenuity. Biblical eschatology places no confidence in mortal endeavors. All hope is placed on that definitive moment when God, and God alone, will storm into our midst to make right all that sin has made wrong. All perversions, distortions, tragedies and maladies will meet their end when the divine reign is universalized and extended into every corner of the cosmos. A theological term for this event is the parousia – it refers to Christ's glorious and certain return. Revelation describes the result of this return as a re-created paradise mirroring that of Eden's garden. ... So when will God make all things right? When will dystopia give way to utopia? Idealists answer with now, cynics with never, but the hopeful realists among us answer with 'already, but not yet.' + pgs. 44-46

What Makes Us Cynical | Religiosity

The greatest work project of the ancient world is a story of disaster. The unexcelled organization and enormous energy that were concentrated in building the Tower of Babel resulted in such a shattered community and garbled communication that civilization is still trying to recover. Effort, even if the effort is religious (perhaps especially when the effort is religious), does not in itself justify anything. + pg. 48, Eugene Peterson, A Long Obedience in the Same Direction


I had been striving for so long to bring God something spiritually impressive enough to earn that precious pronouncement, 'You are my beloved child, with whom I am well pleased' (see Mark 1:11). God, however, was already making that pronouncement. I just lacked the ears to hear. So he instituted a sabbath of sorts for my spiritual activity. The warning of Eugene Peterson was appropriate to my situation: 'If there is no Sabbath – no regular and commanded not-working, not-talking – we soon become totally absorbed in what we are doing and saying, and God's work is either forgotten or marginalized. When we work, we are most god-like, which means that it is in our work that it is easiest to develop god-pretensions. Unsabbathed, our work becomes the entire context in which we define our lives. We lose God-consciousness, God-awareness, sightings of resurrection. We lost the capacity to sing 'This is my Father's World' and end up chirping little self-centered ditties about what we are doing and feeling.' I was in need of instituting a 'sabbath' in my practice of spiritual disciplines because at some point I had begun to equate spirituality with spiritual activity. In my performance-based activity of religious achievement, I had subtly begun to exalt myself, not my Lord. Once again, when we think we are most spiritual before God may actually be when we are most offensive to God. + pg. 56

'Work out your own salvation in fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure' (Philippians 2:12-13). Though God is the ultimate source of the labor that ensures our salvation, we are nonetheless exhorted to work. This tension between our work and God's work becomes strikingly clear when holding up one of Paul's most famed slogans along with one of James's most (unfairly) infamous slogans: 'A person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ' (Galatians 2:16). 'You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone' (James 2:24). ... Another passage that helps us navigate between self-righteous legalism and righteous obedience is Titus 2:11-14. Here, grace is celebrated not only for 'bringing salvation for all people' but also for 'training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives.' Those of us in the Protestant tradition are quite familiar with grace's role of bringing salvation, but less familiar with the notion that grace trains us for ethical living. The Greek verb behind training is paideuo, which can connote sharp discipline (it sometimes means to 'whip' or scourge'). We are not just saved by grace but forcefully motivated by grace to live disciplined lives that are pleasing to the One who graciously saves us. So grace excludes self-righteous religiosity, yet demands righteous obedience. + pgs. 57-58

What Makes Us Cynical | Experientialism 

As we ought not to reject and condemn all affections, as though true religion did not at all consist in them; so, on the other hand, we ought not to approve of all, as though everyone that was religiously affected had true grace, and was therein the subject of the saving influences of the Spirit of God. + pg. 59, Jonathan Edwards, A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections


Experience must never be the criterion of truth; truth must always be the criterion of experience. + pg. 59, John R. W. Stott, Baptism & Fullness

A healthy Christian life cannot be stitched together from a series of disjointed mountain-top experiences. We need a Christian spirituality that endures the shadowy, low-lying valleys and the rocky slopes in between all those glorious summits. We must not discredit or avoid mountain-top experiences, however. They are certainly biblical – just think of Moses receiving the law on Mount Sinai, Elijah calling down fire from Mount Carmel, the Israelites celebrating festivals on Mount Zion, and Jesus being glorified on the Mount of Transfiguration. We must acknowledge, though, that our path will wind through 'the valley of the shadow of death' (Psalm 23:4), and some mountain-top experiences will not be so enjoyable. Moses may have spoken with God 'face to face' on Mount Sinai (Exodus 33:11; cf. Deuteronomy 34:10), but his life mournfully ended on Mount Nebo, where he saw the land whose flowing milk and honey he would never taste. Elijah may have been triumphant on Mount Carmel, but soon afterward he was found scared and dejected on Mount Horeb (Sinai), where God was not in the strong win, the earthquake or the fire. The Israelites may have joyfully sing those Songs of Ascents while climbing Mount Zion at Passover. But those slopes were also scaled by Babylonians who came to besiege and destroy. Jesus radiated in holy splendor on the Mount of Transfiguration, but he died naked and scorned on Calvary's hill. + pg. 64


Emotions are integral to human existence. God made us this way, and he is repeatedly presented in Scripture as an emotional being: 'My heart recoils within me; my compassion grows warm and tender' (Hosea 11:8). ... 'When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in his spirit and greatly troubled. And he said, 'Where have you laid him?' They said to him, 'Lord, come and see.' Jesus wept' (John 11:33-35). 'And (Jesus) looked around at them with anger, grieved at their hardness of heart' (Mark 3:5). 'Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God' (Ephesians 4:30; cf. Isaiah 63:10). God is emotional, and we are made in his image, so emotions are essential to our interaction with him. There is legitimately 'a time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance' (Ecclesiastes 3:4). ... But the Bible discourages an imbalanced reliance on our emotional feelings and impulses. In acknowledging that feelings are important and helpful in many regards, Eugene Peterson bluntly writes that 'they tell me next to nothing about God or my relation to God.' In a chapter titled 'True Religion Is Not Feeling but Willing,' A.W. Tozer writes, 'The emotional life is a proper and noble part of the total personality, but it is, by its very nature of secondary importance.' Every part of who we are has been corrupted by the Fall. Our emotions are not a neutral realm – they have not escaped sin's distorting effects and must not be fully trusted. A regularly dispensed piece of advice among Christians today is 'just follow your heart' (Numbers 15:39; cf. 1 Kings 12:33), and in Jeremiah we hear him say that 'the heart is deceitful above all things, / and desperately sick; / who can understand it?' (Jeremiah 17:9). A few chapters earlier, God addressed Judah as 'evil people ... who stubbornly follow their own heart' (Jeremiah 13:10; cf. Jeremiah 23:17). Our emotions are prone to ungodly tendencies and should be viewed with a healthy degree of suspicion." + pgs. 65-66

Experiential spirituality is quick to validate the authority of spiritual leaders on the basis of their ability to perform signs and wonders. Deuteronomy 13:1-3 demonstrates that it is possible to be spiritually powerful but theologically wrong, and therefore dangerous to God's people. Someone's theology is much more qualifying for leadership than their ability to display or manipulate the supernatural. ... Jesus warned his disciples that 'false christs and false prophets will arise and perform signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect' (Mark 13:22; cf. Matthew 24:24). ... 'Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind' (Colossians 2:18). ... The Corinthians had been guilty themselves of responding inappropriately to God's supernatural power. Proponents of experientialism place considerable attention on 1 Corinthians 12;14, the lengthiest material in the Bible on 'spiritual gifts.' It must be remembered, though, that Paul is writing to correct the Corinthians' response to their corporate experiences of the Spirit. ... We can practice spiritual gifts and yet be unspiritual. There are no legitimate grounds for denying that these gifts are valid for contemporary church life, but it is important to note that the primary reason we know about spiritual gifts from Scripture is because a first-century church was practicing them inappropriately." + pgs. 68-70


There is much more to the work of the Spirit in Scripture than what we read in Acts 2, and much of that work is not sudden and dramatic. In John's Gospel, we learn that the Spirit will guide us 'into all the truth' (John 16:13) – which is certainly not on overnight endeavor. Paul tells us 'we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words' (Romans 8:26). Do we really notice this subtle activity of divine intercession and groaning? Paul also teaches that 'if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live' (Romans 8:13). This work of transformation by God's Spirit can certainly be sudden and dramatic, but for the most part, it is a slow, ongoing process 'from one degree of glory to another' (2 Corinthians 3:18). Rather than instantaneous and flash in the pan, much of the Holy Spirit's work is actually tedious, painstaking, meticulous, subtle and even, at times, unnoticeable. ... (Bezalel) was filled with the Spirit of God to build stuff. Bezalel was a craftsman, a skilled worker filled with the Spirit to make art. Along with his co-laborer Ohaliab, Bezalel served as the project manager for the construction of the altar, the Ark of the Covenant and the other physical accoutrements of the tabernacle ... (Exodus 31:2-5; cf. Exodus 35:30-36:2). The description of Bezalel features words rarely associated in contemporary parlance with the work of the Holy Spirit: ability, intelligence, knowledge, craftsmanship. His Spirit-filled work was far from sudden or immediately sensational – the chiseling, weaving, engraving and constructing were all meticulous, slow and practical. ... During his time at the Genesee monastery, Henri Nouwen wrote of his struggle to discern God in the small, unromantic details of life: 'Maybe I have been living much too fast, too restlessly, too feverishly, forgetting to pay attention to what is happening here and now, right under my nose. Just as a whole world of beauty can be discovered in one flower, so the great grace of God can be tasted in one small moment. Just as no great travels are necessary to see the beauty of creation, so no great ecstasies are needed to discover the love of God. But you have to be still and wait so that you can realize that God is not in the earthquake, the storm, or the lightning, but in the gentle breeze with which he touches your back.' + pgs. 72-74


The Holy Spirit is a person, not an 'it.' He is not an impersonal force or power but the third person of the Trinity. Depersonalizing the third person of the Trinity not only offends the character of our personal God but promotes our tendency to manipulate him. If we view the Spirit of God as a force or a power, then we are tempted to wield and use him rather than worship and serve him. This seems to be the attitude of Simon Magus in Acts 8 when he offered cash to Philip and Peter to gain access to their impressive power. The Holy Spirit is 'the Spirit of Christ' (Romans 8:9; 1 Peter 1:11; cf. Acts 16:7; 2 Corinthians 3:17-18; Philippians 1:19), not the 'power' or the 'energy' of Christ. + pg. 75


'On the left hand when he is working, I do not behold him; he turns to the right hand, but I do not see him' (Job 23:8-9). ... 'Truly you are a God who hides yourself, O God of Israel, the Savior' (Isaiah 45:15). ... To disparage someone because they do not feel or experience anything spiritually wondrous may amount to joining Job's friends in disparaging 'a blameless and upright man' (Job 1:8) and to join the bystanders on Golgotha in disparaging One who 'saved others' but seemed unable to 'save himself' (Mark 15:31). Seasons of non experience are inevitable. We need a spirituality mature enough to endure Mount Nebo and Golgotha as well as Mount Sinai and the Mount of the Transfiguration. Practicing the gifts of the Spirit is much easier than practicing the fruits of the Spirit – our assignment is often not so much to prophesy or speak in tongues but to practice 'patience' and 'faithfulness' (Galatians 5:22) when our quiet times are eerily too quiet. What takes more faith, to rejoice when the presence of God is palpable and clear, or to rejoice in the aching pain of divine absence? 'In his economy of salvation, God needs faith which feels nothing, self-surrender which sees nothing, blind hope which seems to stretch out its hand into the void' – that's from Hans Urs von Balthasar. In discussing contemplative prayer, he also writes that, 'after the few months or years of initial enthusiasm, contemplation enters a stage of testing. Have we really based our lives on the word of God, drawing sustenance from it as earthly men are sustained by earthly food? Do we really do (contemplative prayer) as a reverent service offered to divine love, and not out of a spiritual egoism which is trying to enrich itself or amass spiritual pleasures?' The persistence of 'dry times' tests our hearts to ensure our longings are ultimately for God himself rather than for comforting feelings or impressive experiences. ... 'Though you have not seen him, you love him. Though you do not now see him, you believe in him and rejoice with joy that is inexpressible and filled with glory, obtaining the outcome of your faith, the salvation of your souls' (1 Peter 1:8-9)." + pgs. 77-78

We must not deemphasize the role of the Holy Spirit in our lives, without whom Paul tells us we cannot make the confession 'Jesus is Lord' (1 Corinthians 12:3). Three times throughout 1 Corinthians 12-14 Paul instructs his readers to 'earnestly desire' to be a vessel of the Spirit's supernatural activity within the congregation (1 Corinthians 12:31; 14:1, 39). We are told not to 'quench the Spirit' (1 Thessalonians 5:19) but to 'be filled with the Spirit' (Ephesians 5:18) or we will be named among the 'scoffers ...  devoid of the Spirit' (Jude 18-19). And how can we emotionally disengage from a Lord who 'rejoiced in the Holy Spirit' (Luke 10:21) and, in a violent display of emotion, 'wept' at Lazarus's tomb? (John 11:35). ... Though Paul envisioned the local congregation functioning as a body comprising multiple members with differing gifts (1 Corinthians 12; Romans 12:4-8; cf. Ephesians 4:1-16), we have now created situations where the more dramatic spiritual gifts are allowed to thrive without the corrective influence of those gifts that are perhaps a bit less glamorous. Disaffected intellectual teaching is regularly allowed to thrive without the balancing effects of more emotional personality types and dramatic displays of supernatural power. We have dismembered ourselves from a more diverse experience of body life and conglomerated with similar dismembered parts, thereby eliminating the intended tension provided by complementary and mutually corrective gifts. Does our local church function as a body or as a collection of fingers or ears? In this homogenous set up, all the hands have gathered on one street corner with the legs across the street and the eyes a few blocks down. The solution to the current dismembered status of the church requires something terribly awkward: emotional enthusiasts and cynical skeptics need to hang out over coffee and start worshiping together. + pgs. 81-82 

What Makes Us Cynical | Anti-Intellectualism

Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature. + pg. 86, 1 Corinthians 14:20
Helmut Thieleck in his book, A Little Exercise for Young Theologians ... urges young Christian scholars to ensure that their intellectual training never exceeds their spiritual maturity (or at least be aware of the potential gap between the two). ... The pastor must be gentle and patient as a teacher (just as the congregation will have to be a gentle and patient teacher of the pastor). + pgs. 97-98

Jesus cites ... from the passage introduced by the Shema (from the Hebrew verb 'to hear'): 'Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one' (Deuteronomy 6:4). Immediately following this command (which has been recited daily by devout Jews since before Jesus' day) is the command to love God with all of our being, including our minds. Jesus then appends to this Leviticus 19:18, demonstrating that a love for God is never to be disconnected from a love of people. ... In the wider passage (the co-text if you will), loving God with our entire being is inseparable from knowing and meditating on his words: ... And these words that I command you today shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates' (Deuteronomy 6:4-9, emphasis added). Here we see the context of the highest demand placed on our lives as Christians – loving God with everything – is the diligent instruction and unending discussion of Scripture. There is no arena of our lives – 'when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise" – that can be divorced from a constant engagement with God's words. We should not have to go to seminary to become a serious student of Scripture: the words of God are to be unavoidably present in all aspects of a believer's life (figuratively speaking, on our hands, between our eyes, in our houses and on our gates). The neglect of serious, mature thinking stands in direct conflict with that which is most binding in our lives: the greatest commandment according to Jesus. + pg. 99

The haunting account of the Fall demonstrates that the pursuit of knowledge for the sake of knowledge is potentially devastating. The knowing we must be devoted to is ultimately knowing a Person, God. Since he is most imminently presented to us in his carefully crafted written Word, then we must devote ourselves to mature thinking. But those with mature thinking do not gloat over God's Word. They tremble. 'This is the one to whom I will look: he who is humble and contrite in spirit and trembles at my word' (Isaiah 66:2). + pgs. 100-101

What Makes Us Cynical | Cultural Irrelevance 

If we really hope for the kingdom of God, then we can also endure the Church in its pettiness. + pgs. 100-101, Karl Barth, Dogmatics in Outline

The provincial 'ghetto' of Christian subculture: churchianity. Many of us tend to treat our churches as safe enclaves for escapism rather than as launching pads for missional living. ... Churchianity would not sit well with the apostle Paul. Not only did he strive to 'become all things to all people' (1 Corinthians 9:22), he also persistently taught the early churches to be conscientious about their behavior toward 'outsiders': 'If therefore, the whole church comes together and all speak in tongues, and outsiders or unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are out of your minds?' (1 Corinthians 14:23). 'Conduct yourselves wisely toward outsiders, making the best use of the time' (Colossians 4:5, ESV). 'Aspire to live quietly, and to mind your own affairs, and to work with your hands, as we instructed you, so that you may live properly before outsiders and be dependent on no one' (1 Thessalonians 4:11-12). 'Moreover, he (an authoritative church leader) must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil' (1 Timothy 3:7). When Paul preached in Athens, he cited a Greek poet and used on of their own religious monuments for an illustration. When he visited the Jerusalem temple, he shaved his head as one committed to a Jewish religious vow. In his letters he provided careful instructions for Jewish Christians not to impose their own religious culture on Gentile Christians. Churchianity doesn't sit well with Jesus, either. Nothing evidences the need for the gospel to be communicated crossculturally more than the incarnation, when the preexistent Son of God left his heavenly realm to enter the day-to-day grind of first-century Palestine. When 'the Word became flesh' (John 1:14), God was going to the extreme to reach people in accessible, relevant ways. + pgs. 105-106

Disappointment in the cultural irrelevance of the church is justifiable. But much of the disappointment may stem as much from a culturally conditioned arrogance as from a sincere commitment to missional, crosscultural living. When we younger adults rail against the Christian subculture of primarily older generations for their narrow-minded cultural illiteracy, we often fail to notice that we are ourselves part of a subculture with its own narrowness and cultural ignorance. ... Are we striving to understand the struggles of those in their mid-forties rearing teenagers? Are we making strides to relate to the loneliness of empty-nest divorcees? Are we able to express genuine interest on the news programs and game shows that feature in the living rooms of our grandparents? Are we willing to venture out into the cultural realm of retirees or learn from that diminishing number of WWII veterans? ... The reason God's people existed as a divided kingdom (Israel in the north and Judah in the south) was because Solomon's rash young son Rehoboam refused to heed the wisdom of his elders: 'He abandoned the counsel that the old men gave him and took counsel with the young men who had grown up with him and stood before him' (1 Kings 12:8). He listened to the arrogant advice of his peers and saw the kingdom ripped apart before his youthful eyes – an ancient case, perhaps, of cultural arrogance. + pgs. 109-110 

Though Jesus and Paul stand as New Testament witnesses to the need for cultural relevance, they also demonstrate the need for being countercultural. The mission of God's kingdom requires that we insightfully engage culture while presenting a message that will inevitably challenge culture. The escapism of cultural irrelevance is not to be replaced with the conformism of cultural assimilation: 'We have no liberty to preserve our holiness by escaping from the world, or to sacrifice our holiness by conforming to the world. Escapism and conformism are both forbidden to us.' Those of us committed to communicating the gospel to younger, more cynical generations must heed the wisdom of Henri Nouwen, who wrote that one of the greatest temptations Christian leaders will face is the temptation to be relevant. Being culturally relevant to a fallen culture is not exactly the goal, is it? Nouwen writes, 'I am convinced that the Christian leader of the future is called to be completely irrelevant and to stand in this world with nothing to offer but his or her own vulnerable self. ... We must offer that which transcends all cultural preferences: genuine human relationships that reflect the gospel and the love of Christ. + pgs. 111-112 

A biblical community ...  maintains an inward health along with outward vision. What we find in the early pages of the book of Acts is a church that promotes not only a profound sense of cohesion with powerful inner dynamics but also a vigorous outreach to their surrounding environs. + pg. 113

Next post: CN | Faith in Christ: Sacrificial Embrace Over Cynical Rejection

City Notes are meant to provide you with direct quotes from some books I've read this year, so you can get a taste of the overall theme of the book and then begin to chew on what your life might look like if you applied what you read.

Here are links to previous City Notes books: A Meal with Jesus; The Art of NeighboringA Praying Life Encounters with JesusThe Rest of God; Everyday ChurchNotes from a Failed Missionary on Rediscovering FaithThe Pursuing GodYawning at Tigers; Gospel Fluency; Evangelical, Sacramental, and Pentecostal

+ Rev. Mike "Sully" Sullivan